Natural pentacyclic triterpenoid from Pristimerin sensitizes p53-deficient tumor to PARP inhibitor by ubiquitination of Chk1.

Inhibition of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) has shown to overcome resistance to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and expand the clinical utility of PARP inhibitors in a broad range of human cancers. Pristimerin, a naturally occurring pentacyclic triterpenoid, has been the focus of intensive studies for its anticancer potential. However, it is not yet known whether low dose of pristimerin can be combined with PARP inhibitors by targeting Chk1 signaling pathway. In this study, we investigated the efficacy, safety and molecular mechanisms of the synergistic effect produced by the combination olaparib and pristimerin in TP53-deficient and BRCA-proficient cell models. As a result, an increased expression of Chk1 was correlated with TP53 mutation, and pristimerin preferentially sensitized p53-defective cells to olaparib. The combination of olaparib and pristimerin resulted in a more pronounced abrogation of DNA synthesis and induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Moreover, pristimerin disrupted the constitutional levels of Chk1 and DSB repair activities. Mechanistically, pristimerin promoted K48-linked polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of Chk1 while not affecting its kinase domain and activity. Importantly, combinatorial therapy led to a higher rate of tumor growth inhibition without apparent hematological toxicities. In addition, pristimerin suppressed olaparib-induced upregulation of Chk1 and enhanced olaparib-induced DSB marker γΗ2ΑΧ in vivo. Taken together, inhibition of Chk1 by pristimerin has been observed to induce DNA repair deficiency, which may expand the application of olaparib in BRCA-proficient cancers harboring TP53 mutations. Thus, pristimerin can be combined for PARP inhibitor-based therapy.

Cucurbitacin B suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma progression through inducing DNA damage-dependent cell cycle arrest.

BACKGROUND: The mortality rate of liver cancer ranks third in the world, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a malignant tumor of the digestive tract. Cucurbitacin B (CuB), a natural compound extracted from Cucurbitaceae spp., is the main active component of Chinese patent medicine the Cucurbitacin Tablet, which has been widely used in the treatment of various malignant tumors in clinics, especially HCC. PURPOSE: This study explored the role and mechanism of CuB in the suppression of liver cancer progression. METHODS: Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) and colony formation assays were used to detect the inhibitory function of CuB in Huh7, Hep3B, and Hepa1/6 hepatoma cells. Calcein-AM/propidium iodide (PI) staining and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) measurement assays were performed to determine cell death. Mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) was measured, and flow cytometry was performed to evaluate cell apoptosis and cell cycle. Several techniques, such as proteomics, Western blotting (WB), and ribonucleic acid (RNA) interference, were utilized to explore the potential mechanism. The animal experiment was performed to verify the results of in vitro experiments. RESULTS: CuB significantly inhibited the growth of Huh7, Hep3B, and Hepa1/6 cells and triggered the cell cycle arrest in G2/M phage without leading to cell death, especially apoptosis. Knockdown of insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 1 (IGF2BP1), a target of CuB, did not reverse CuB elicited cell cycle arrest. CuB enhanced phosphorylated ataxia telangiectasia mutated (p-ATM) and phosphorylated H2A histone family member X (γ-H2AX) levels. Moreover, CuB increased p53 and p21 levels and decreased cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) expression, accompanied by improving phosphorylated checkpoint kinase 1 (p-CHK1) level and suppressing cell division cycle 25C (CDC25C) protein level. Interestingly, these phenomena were partly abolished by a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) protector methylproamine (MPA). Animal studies showed that CuB also significantly suppressed tumor growth in BALB/c mice bearing Hepa1/6 cells. In tumor tissues, CuB reduced the expression levels of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and γ-H2AX but did not change the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase deoxyuridine triphosphate (dUTP) nick-end labeling (TUNEL) level. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated for the first time that CuB could effectively impede HCC progression by inducing DNA damage-dependent cell cycle arrest without directly triggering cell death, such as necrosis and apoptosis. The effect was achieved through ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-dependent p53-p21-CDK1 and checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1)-CDC25C signaling pathways. These findings indicate that CuB may be used as an anti-HCC drug, when the current findings are confirmed by independent studies and after many more clinical phase 1, 2, 3, and 4 testings have been done.

Monitoring Chk1 kinase activity dynamics in live single cell imaging assays.

The ATR/Chk1 pathway is an important regulator of cell cycle progression, notably upon genotoxic stress where it can detect a large variety of DNA alterations and induce a transient cell cycle arrest that promotes DNA repair. In addition to its role in DNA damage response (DDR), Chk1 is also active during a non-perturbed S phase and contributes to prevent a premature entry into mitosis with an incompletely replicated genome, meaning the ATR/Chk1 pathway is an integral part of the cell cycle machinery that preserves genome integrity during cell growth. We recently developed a FRET-based Chk1 kinase activity reporter to directly monitor and quantify the kinetics of Chk1 activation in live single cell imaging assays with unprecedented sensitivity and time resolution. This tool allowed us to monitor Chk1 activity dynamics over time during a normal S phase and following genotoxic stress, and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms leading to its activation. Here, we review available fluorescent tools to study the interplay of cell cycle progression, DNA damage and DDR in individual live cells, and present the full protocol and image analysis pipeline to monitor Chk1 activity in two imaging assays.

Key Proteins of Replication Stress Response and Cell Cycle Control as Cancer Therapy Targets.

Replication stress (RS) is a characteristic state of cancer cells as they tend to exchange precision of replication for fast proliferation and increased genomic instability. To overcome the consequences of improper replication control, malignant cells frequently inactivate parts of their DNA damage response (DDR) pathways (the ATM-CHK2-p53 pathway), while relying on other pathways which help to maintain replication fork stability (ATR-CHK1). This creates a dependency on the remaining DDR pathways, vulnerability to further destabilization of replication and synthetic lethality of DDR inhibitors with common oncogenic alterations such as mutations of TP53, RB1, ATM, amplifications of MYC, CCNE1 and others. The response to RS is normally limited by coordination of cell cycle, transcription and replication. Inhibition of WEE1 and PKMYT1 kinases, which prevent unscheduled mitosis entry, leads to fragility of under-replicated sites. Recent evidence also shows that inhibition of Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), such as CDK4/6, CDK2, CDK8/19 and CDK12/13 can contribute to RS through disruption of DNA repair and replication control. Here, we review the main causes of RS in cancers as well as main therapeutic targets-ATR, CHK1, PARP and their inhibitors.

CTPS1 is a novel therapeutic target in multiple myeloma which synergizes with inhibition of CHEK1, ATR or WEE1.

Targeting nucleotide biosynthesis is a proven strategy for the treatment of cancer but is limited by toxicity, reflecting the fundamental nucleotide requirement of dividing cells. The rate limiting step in de novo pyrimidine synthesis is of interest, being catalyzed by two homologous enzymes, CTP synthase 1 (CTPS1) and CTPS2, that could be differentially targeted. Herein, analyses of publicly available datasets identified an essential role for CTPS1 in multiple myeloma (MM), linking high expression of CTPS1 (but not CTPS2) with advanced disease and poor outcomes. In cellular experiments, CTPS1 knockout induced apoptosis of MM cell lines. Exposure of MM cells to STP-B, a novel and highly selective pharmacological inhibitor of CTPS1, inhibited proliferation, induced S phase arrest and led to cell death by apoptosis. Mechanistically, CTPS1 inhibition by STP-B activated DNA damage response (DDR) pathways and induced double-strand DNA breaks which accumulated in early S phase. Combination of STP-B with pharmacological inhibitors of key components of the DDR pathway (ATR, CHEK1 or WEE1) resulted in synergistic growth inhibition and early apoptosis. Taken together, these findings identify CTPS1 as a promising new target in MM, either alone or in combination with DDR pathway inhibition.

Preclinical Evaluation of the ATR Inhibitor BAY 1895344 as a Radiosensitizer for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Despite aggressive multimodal treatment that typically includes definitive or adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), locoregional recurrence rates approach 50% for patients with locally advanced human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Thus, more effective therapeutics are needed to improve patient outcomes. We evaluated the radiosensitizing effects of ataxia telangiectasia and RAD3-related (ATR) inhibitor (ATRi) BAY 1895344 in preclinical models of HNSCC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Murine and human HPV-negative HNSCC cells (MOC2, MOC1, JHU-012) were treated with vehicle or ATRi with or without 4 Gy. Checkpoint kinase 1 phosphorylation and DNA damage (γH2AX) were evaluated by Western blot, and ATRi half-maximal inhibitory concentration was determined by MTT assay for HNSCC cells and immortalized murine oral keratinocytes. In vitro radiosensitization was tested by clonogenic assay. Cell cycle distribution and mitotic catastrophe were evaluated by flow cytometry. Mitotic aberrations were quantified by fluorescent microscopy. Tumor growth delay and survival were assessed in mice bearing MOC2 or JHU-012 transplant tumors treated with vehicle, ATRi, RT (10 Gy × 1 or 8 Gy × 3), or combined ATRi + RT. RESULTS: ATRi caused dose-dependent reduction in checkpoint kinase 1 phosphorylation at 1 hour post-RT (4 Gy) and dose-dependent increase in γH2AX at 18 hours post-RT. Addition of RT to ATRi led to decreased BAY 1895344 half-maximal inhibitory concentration in HNSCC cell lines but not in normal tissue surrogate immortalized murine oral keratinocytes. Clonogenic assays demonstrated radiosensitization in the HNSCC cell lines. ATRi abrogated the RT-induced G2/M checkpoint, leading to mitosis with unrepaired DNA damage and increased mitotic aberrations (multinucleated cells, micronuclei, nuclear buds, nucleoplasmic bridges). ATRi and RT significantly delayed tumor growth in MOC2 and JHU-012 in vivo models, with improved overall survival in the MOC2 model. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrated that BAY 1895344 increased in vitro and in vivo radiosensitivity in HPV-negative HNSCC preclinical models, suggesting therapeutic potential warranting evaluation in clinical trials for patients with locally advanced or recurrent HPV-negative HNSCC.

Hydrogen sulfide ameliorates lipopolysaccharide-induced anxiety-like behavior by inhibiting checkpoint kinase 1 activation in the hippocampus of mice.

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S), an endogenous gasotransmitter, exhibits the anxiolytic roles through its anti-inflammatory effects, although its underlying mechanisms remain largely elusive. Emerging evidence has documented that cell cycle checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1)-regulated DNA damage plays an important role in the neurodegenerative diseases; however, there are few relevant reports on the research of Chk1 in neuropsychiatric diseases. Here, we aimed to investigate the regulatory role of H2S on Chk1 in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced anxiety-like behavior focusing on inflammasome activation in the hippocampus. Cystathionine γ-lyase (CSE, a H2S-producing enzyme) knockout (CSE-/-) mice displayed anxiety-like behavior and activation of inflammasome-mediated inflammatory responses, manifesting by the increase levels of interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß), IL-6, and ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule-1 (Iba-1, microglia marker) expression in the hippocampus. Importantly, expression of p-Chk1 and γ-H2AX (DNA damage marker) levels were also increased in the hippocampus of CSE-/- mice. LPS treatment decreased the expression of CSE and CBS while increased p-Chk1 and γ-H2AX levels and inflammasome-activated neuroinflammation in the hippocampus of mice. Moreover, p-Chk1 and γ-H2AX protein levels and cellular immunoactivity were significantly increased while CSE and CBS were markedly decreased in cultured BV2 cells followed by LPS treatment. Treatment of mice with GYY4137, a donor of H2S, inhibited LPS-induced increased in p-Chk1 and γ-H2AX levels, mitigated inflammasome activation and inflammatory responses as well as amelioration of anxiety-like behavior. Notably, SB-218078, a selective Chk1 inhibitor treatment attenuated the effect of LPS on inflammasome activation and inflammatory responses and the induction of anxiety-like behavior. Finally, STAT3 knockdown with AAV-STAT3 shRNA alleviated LPS-induced anxiety-like behavior and inhibited inflammasome activation in the hippocampus, and blockade of NLRP3 with MCC950 attenuated neuroinflammation induction and ameliorated LPS-induced anxiety-like behavior. Overall, this study indicates that downregulation of Chk1 activity by H2S activation may be considered as a valid strategy for preventing the progression of LPS-induced anxiety-like behavior.

Synergistic lethality between auranofin-induced oxidative DNA damage and ATR inhibition in cancer cells.

AIMS: Studies in the past have shown that inhibition of the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase sensitizes cancer cells to genotoxic anticancer treatments, however, clinical use of ATR inhibitors in combination with DNA damaging chemotherapy is limited due to toxicity in healthy tissues. In this study, we investigated the synergistic anticancer effect between ATR inhibition and oxidative DNA damage induced by the thioredoxin reductase inhibitor auranofin. MAIN METHODS: Cytotoxicity was evaluated by cell viability assays. Western blot, comet assay, immunostaining and flow cytometry were performed to dissect the underlying mechanisms. In vivo efficacy was examined against tumor xenografts. KEY FINDINGS: Nontoxic doses of auranofin alone increased the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cancer but not noncancerous cells, resulting in oxidative DNA damage and activation of the ATR DNA damage response pathway selectively in cancer cells. Inhibition of ATR in auranofin-treated cancer cells resulted in unscheduled firing of dormant DNA replication origins, abrogation of the S phase cell cycle checkpoint and extensive DNA breakage, leading to replication catastrophe and potent synergistic lethality. Both the antioxidant NAC and the DNA polymerase inhibitor aphidicolin reduced replication stress and synergistic cytotoxicity, implicating replication stress-driven catastrophic cell death resulted from collision between oxidative DNA damage and dysregulated DNA replication. In vivo, auranofin and VE822 coadministration enabled marked regressions of tumor xenografts, while each drug alone had no effect. SIGNIFICANCE: As increased generation of ROS is a universal feature of tumors, our findings may open new routes to broaden the therapeutic potential of ATR inhibitors.

SIRT3-dependent mitochondrial redox homeostasis mitigates CHK1 inhibition combined with gemcitabine treatment induced cardiotoxicity in hiPSC-CMs and mice.

Administration of CHK1-targeted anticancer therapies is associated with an increased cumulative risk of cardiac complications, which is further amplified when combined with gemcitabine. However, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. In this study, we generated hiPSC-CMs and murine models to elucidate the mechanisms underlying CHK1 inhibition combined with gemcitabine-induced cardiotoxicity and identify potential targets for cardioprotection. Mice were intraperitoneally injected with 25 mg/kg CHK1 inhibitor AZD7762 and 20 mg/kg gemcitabine for 3 weeks. hiPSC-CMs and NMCMs were incubated with 0.5 uM AZD7762 and 0.1 uM gemcitabine for 24 h. Both pharmacological inhibition or genetic deletion of CHK1 and administration of gemcitabine induced mtROS overproduction and pyroptosis in cardiomyocytes by disrupting mitochondrial respiration, ultimately causing heart atrophy and cardiac dysfunction in mice. These toxic effects were further exacerbated with combination administration. Using mitochondria-targeting sequence-directed vectors to overexpress CHK1 in cardiomyocyte (CM) mitochondria, we identified the localization of CHK1 in CM mitochondria and its crucial role in maintaining mitochondrial redox homeostasis for the first time. Mitochondrial CHK1 function loss mediated the cardiotoxicity induced by AZD7762 and CHK1-knockout. Mechanistically, mitochondrial CHK1 directly phosphorylates SIRT3 and promotes its expression within mitochondria. On the contrary, both AZD7762 or CHK1-knockout and gemcitabine decreased mitochondrial SIRT3 abundance, thus resulting in respiration dysfunction. Further hiPSC-CMs and mice experiments demonstrated that SIRT3 overexpression maintained mitochondrial function while alleviating CM pyroptosis, and thereby improving mice cardiac function. In summary, our results suggest that targeting SIRT3 could represent a novel therapeutic approach for clinical prevention and treatment of cardiotoxicity induced by CHK1 inhibition and gemcitabine.

Abrogation of ATR function preferentially augments cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity in PTEN-deficient breast cancer cells.

Targeting replication stress response is currently emerging as new therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment, based on monotherapy and combination approaches. As a key sensor in response to DNA damage, ataxia telangiectasia and rad3-related (ATR) kinase has become a potential therapeutic target as tumor cells are to rely heavily on ATR for survival. The tumor suppressor phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) plays a crucial role in maintaining chromosome integrity. Although ATR inhibition was recently confirmed to show a synergistic inhibitory effect in PTEN-deficient triple-negative breast cancer cells, the molecular mechanism needs to be further elucidated. Additionally, whether the PTEN-deficient breast cancer cells are more preferentially sensitized than PTEN-wild type breast cancer cells to cisplatin plus ATR inhibitor remains unanswered. We demonstrate PTEN dysfunction promotes the killing effect of ATR blockade through the use of RNA interference for PTEN and a highly selective ATR inhibitor VE-821, and certify that VE-821 (1.0 µmol/L) aggravates cytotoxicity of cisplatin on breast cancer cells, especially PTEN-null MDA-MB-468 cells which show more chemoresistance than PTEN-expressing MDA-MB-231 cells. The co-treatment with VE-821 and cisplatin significantly reduced cell viability and proliferative capacity compared with cisplatin mono-treatment (P < 0.05). The increased cytotoxic activity is tied to the enhanced poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage and consequently cell death due to the decrease in phosphorylation levels of checkpoint kinases 1 and 2 (CHK1/2), the reduction of radiation sensitive 51 (RAD51) foci and the increase in phosphorylation of the histone variant H2AX (γ-H2AX) foci (P < 0.05) as well. Together, these findings suggest combination therapy of ATR inhibitor and cisplatin may offer a potential therapeutic strategy for breast tumors.

Chronic treatment with ATR and CHK1 inhibitors does not substantially increase the mutational burden of human cells.

DNA replication stress (RS) entails the frequent slow down and arrest of replication forks by a variety of conditions that hinder accurate and processive genome duplication. Elevated RS leads to genome instability, replication catastrophe and eventually cell death. RS is particularly prevalent in cancer cells and its exacerbation to unsustainable levels by chemotherapeutic agents remains a cornerstone of cancer treatments. The adverse consequences of RS are normally prevented by the ATR and CHK1 checkpoint kinases that stabilize stressed forks, suppress origin firing and promote cell cycle arrest when replication is perturbed. Specific inhibitors of these kinases have been developed and shown to potentiate RS and cell death in multiple in vitro cancer settings. Ongoing clinical trials are now probing their efficacy against various cancer types, either as single agents or in combination with mainstay chemotherapeutics. Despite their promise as valuable additions to the anti-cancer pharmacopoeia, we still lack a genome-wide view of the potential mutagenicity of these new drugs. To investigate this question, we performed chronic long-term treatments of TP53-depleted human cancer cells with ATR and CHK1 inhibitors (ATRi, AZD6738/ceralasertib and CHK1i, MK8776/SCH-900776). ATR or CHK1 inhibition did not significantly increase the mutational burden of cells, nor generate specific mutational signatures. Indeed, no notable changes in the numbers of base substitutions, short insertions/deletions and larger scale rearrangements were observed despite induction of replication-associated DNA breaks during treatments. Interestingly, ATR inhibition did induce a slight increase in closely-spaced mutations, a feature previously attributed to translesion synthesis DNA polymerases. The results suggest that ATRi and CHK1i do not have substantial mutagenic effects in vitro when used as standalone agents.

Cys-regulation: oxidized CHK1 controls cross-compartment circuit of chemoresistance.

In a recent study published in Cell, Zhang et al. integrate genome-wide CRISPRi screening with cysteine chemoproteomics to identify functionally relevant oxidation events associated with the cellular response to chemotherapy. This work uncovered checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) as a nuclear reactive oxygen species (ROS) sensor that mediates chemoresistance through the suppression of mitochondrial protein synthesis.

The Adaptive Mechanisms and Checkpoint Responses to a Stressed DNA Replication Fork.

DNA replication is a tightly controlled process that ensures the faithful duplication of the genome. However, DNA damage arising from both endogenous and exogenous assaults gives rise to DNA replication stress associated with replication fork slowing or stalling. Therefore, protecting the stressed fork while prompting its recovery to complete DNA replication is critical for safeguarding genomic integrity and cell survival. Specifically, the plasticity of the replication fork in engaging distinct DNA damage tolerance mechanisms, including fork reversal, repriming, and translesion DNA synthesis, enables cells to overcome a variety of replication obstacles. Furthermore, stretches of single-stranded DNA generated upon fork stalling trigger the activation of the ATR kinase, which coordinates the cellular responses to replication stress by stabilizing the replication fork, promoting DNA repair, and controlling cell cycle and replication origin firing. Deregulation of the ATR checkpoint and aberrant levels of chronic replication stress is a common characteristic of cancer and a point of vulnerability being exploited in cancer therapy. Here, we discuss the various adaptive responses of a replication fork to replication stress and the roles of ATR signaling that bring fork stabilization mechanisms together. We also review how this knowledge is being harnessed for the development of checkpoint inhibitors to trigger the replication catastrophe of cancer cells.

Phosphoregulation of the checkpoint kinase Mec1ATR.

Yeast Mec1, and its mammalian ortholog, Ataxia-Telangiectasia and Rad3-related, are giant protein kinases central to replication stress and double strand DNA break repair. Mec1ATR, in complex with Ddc2ATRIP, is a 'sensor' of single stranded DNA, and phosphorylates numerous cell cycle and DNA repair factors to enforce cell cycle arrest and facilitate repair. Over the last several years, new techniques - particularly in structural biology - have provided molecular mechanisms for Mec1ATR function. It is becoming increasingly clear how post-translational modification of Mec1ATR and its interaction partners modulates the DNA damage checkpoint. In this review, we summarise the most recent work unravelling Mec1ATR function in the DNA damage checkpoint and provide a molecular context for its regulation by phosphorylation.

Alteration of replication protein A binding mode on single-stranded DNA by NSMF potentiates RPA phosphorylation by ATR kinase.

Replication protein A (RPA), a eukaryotic single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding protein, dynamically interacts with ssDNA in different binding modes and plays essential roles in DNA metabolism such as replication, repair, and recombination. RPA accumulation on ssDNA due to replication stress triggers the DNA damage response (DDR) by activating the ataxia telangiectasia and RAD3-related (ATR) kinase, which phosphorylates itself and downstream DDR factors, including RPA. We recently reported that the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor (NSMF), a neuronal protein associated with Kallmann syndrome, promotes RPA32 phosphorylation via ATR upon replication stress. However, how NSMF enhances ATR-mediated RPA32 phosphorylation remains elusive. Here, we demonstrate that NSMF colocalizes and physically interacts with RPA at DNA damage sites in vivo and in vitro. Using purified RPA and NSMF in biochemical and single-molecule assays, we find that NSMF selectively displaces RPA in the more weakly bound 8- and 20-nucleotide binding modes from ssDNA, allowing the retention of more stable RPA molecules in the 30-nt binding mode. The 30-nt binding mode of RPA enhances RPA32 phosphorylation by ATR, and phosphorylated RPA becomes stabilized on ssDNA. Our findings provide new mechanistic insight into how NSMF facilitates the role of RPA in the ATR pathway.

Replisome dysfunction upon inducible TIMELESS degradation synergizes with ATR inhibition to trigger replication catastrophe.

The structure of DNA replication forks is preserved by TIMELESS (TIM) in the fork protection complex (FPC) to support seamless fork progression. While the scaffolding role of the FPC to couple the replisome activity is much appreciated, the detailed mechanism whereby inherent replication fork damage is sensed and counteracted during DNA replication remains largely elusive. Here, we implemented an auxin-based degron system that rapidly triggers inducible proteolysis of TIM as a source of endogenous DNA replication stress and replisome dysfunction to dissect the signaling events that unfold at stalled forks. We demonstrate that acute TIM degradation activates the ATR-CHK1 checkpoint, whose inhibition culminates in replication catastrophe by single-stranded DNA accumulation and RPA exhaustion. Mechanistically, unrestrained replisome uncoupling, excessive origin firing, and aberrant reversed fork processing account for the synergistic fork instability. Simultaneous TIM loss and ATR inactivation triggers DNA-PK-dependent CHK1 activation, which is unexpectedly necessary for promoting fork breakage by MRE11 and catastrophic cell death. We propose that acute replisome dysfunction results in a hyper-dependency on ATR to activate local and global fork stabilization mechanisms to counteract irreversible fork collapse. Our study identifies TIM as a point of replication vulnerability in cancer that can be exploited with ATR inhibitors.

Emerging strategies for cancer therapy by ATR inhibitors.

DNA replication stress (RS) causes genomic instability and vulnerability in cancer cells. To counteract RS, cells have evolved various mechanisms involving the ATR kinase signaling pathway, which regulates origin firing, cell cycle checkpoints, and fork stabilization to secure the fidelity of replication. However, ATR signaling also alleviates RS to support cell survival by driving RS tolerance, thereby contributing to therapeutic resistance. Cancer cells harboring genetic mutations and other changes that disrupt normal DNA replication increase the risk of DNA damage and the levels of RS, conferring addiction to ATR activity for sustainable replication and susceptibility to therapeutic approaches using ATR inhibitors (ATRis). Therefore, clinical trials are currently being conducted to evaluate the efficacy of ATRis as monotherapies or in combination with other drugs and biomarkers. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the elucidation of the mechanisms by which ATR functions in the RS response and its therapeutic relevance when utilizing ATRis.

ATF2 loss promotes 5-FU resistance in colon cancer cells via activation of the ATR-Chk1 damage response pathway.

BACKGROUND: The role of ATF2 in colon cancer (CC) is controversial. Recently, we reported that low ATF2 expression is characteristic of highly invasive tumors, suggesting that ATF2 might also be involved in therapy resistance. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is the best-known chemotherapeutic drug for CC, but drug resistance affects its curative effect. To date, the role of ATF2 in the 5-FU response remains elusive. METHODS/RESULTS: For our study, we had available HCT116 cells (wild-type p53) and HT29 colon tumor cells (mutant p53) and their corresponding CRISPR‒Cas9-generated ATF2-KO clones. We observed that loss of ATF2 triggered dose- and time-dependent 5-FU resistance in HCT116 cells by activating the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway with high p-ATRThr1989 and p-Chk1Ser317 levels accompanied by an increase in the DNA damage marker γ-H2AX in vitro and in vivo using the chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model. Chk1 inhibitor studies causally displayed the link between DDR and drug resistance. There were contradictory findings in HT29 ATF2-KO cells upon 5-FU exposure with low p-Chk1Ser317 levels, strong apoptosis induction, but no effects on DNA damage. In ATF2-silenced HCT116 p53-/- cells, 5-FU did not activate the DDR pathway. Co-immunoprecipitation and proximity ligation assays revealed that upon 5-FU treatment, ATF2 binds to ATR to prevent Chk1 phosphorylation. Indeed, in silico modelling showed reduced ATR-Chk1 binding when ATF2 was docked into the complex. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a novel ATF2 scaffold function involved in the DDR pathway. ATF2-negative cells are highly resistant due to effective ATR/Chk1 DNA damage repair. Mutant p53 seems to overwrite the tumor suppressor function of ATF2.

Checkpoint Kinase 1 Is a Key Signal Transducer of DNA Damage in the Early Mammalian Cleavage Embryo.

After fertilization, remodeling of the oocyte and sperm genome is essential for the successful initiation of mitotic activity in the fertilized oocyte and subsequent proliferative activity of the early embryo. Despite the fact that the molecular mechanisms of cell cycle control in early mammalian embryos are in principle comparable to those in somatic cells, there are differences resulting from the specific nature of the gene totipotency of the blastomeres of early cleavage embryos. In this review, we focus on the Chk1 kinase as a key transduction factor in monitoring the integrity of DNA molecules during early embryogenesis.

AZD6738 promotes the tumor suppressive effects of trifluridine in colorectal cancer cells.

Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3­related (ATR) is a kinase that repairs DNA damage. Although inhibitors that selectively target ATR have been developed, their effectiveness in colorectal cancer has not been widely reported. The present study hypothesized that anticancer agents that effectively act in the S phase before the G2/M checkpoint may be ideal agents for concomitant use with ATR inhibitors, which act at the G2/M checkpoint. Therefore, the present study examined the combined effects of AZD6738, an ATR inhibitor, and trifluridine (FTD), which acts in the S phase and has a high DNA uptake rate. In vitro cell viability assays, flow cytometry and western blotting were performed to evaluate cell viability, and changes in cell cycle localization and protein expression. The results revealed that in colorectal cancer cells, the combination of AZD6738 and FTD inhibited cell viability, cell cycle arrest at the G2/M checkpoint and Chk1 phosphorylation, and increased apoptotic protein expression levels more than that when treated with FTD alone. HT29, a BRAF­mutant cell line known to be resistant to anticancer drugs, was used to induce tumors in vivo. Since FTD does not have sufficient efficacy when administered orally, it was mixed with tipiracil to prevent degradation; this mixture is known as TAS­102. TAS­102 alone exerted minimal tumor suppressive effects; however, when used in combination with AZD6738, tumor suppression was observed, suggesting that AZD6738 may increase the effectiveness of a weakly effective drug. Although ATR inhibitors are effective against p53 mutants, the present study demonstrated that these inhibitors were also effective against the p53 wild­type HCT116 colorectal cancer cell line. In conclusion, combination therapy with AZD6738 and FTD enhanced the inhibition of tumor proliferation in vitro and in vivo. In the future, we aim to investigate the potentiating effect of AZD6738 on 5­fluouracil­resistant cell lines that are difficult to treat.